Skip to main content
site map
contact
our twitterour facebook page pintrest youtubeinstagramtumbler
Thursday, August 15 2019
Abortion Reporting in Wyoming

For the vast majority of Wyomingites the sanctity of life is of profound importance, and this extends well beyond the womb. Over this last year we had a county commissioner vacancy in Campbell County. The man who was eventually appointed to the seat is unashamedly pro-life, and his life’s actions proved it with fostering dozens of children over the years. This is inspiring, and yet there is more work to be done.

When I was first elected to the Wyoming House an argument was made on the House floor that we didn’t need any more pro-life laws because there wasn’t any abortions in Wyoming. Since the 1970’s we had a law on the books, enacted by a Democrat Governor, that required abortion providers to submit a report on how many abortions took place. The year after it was enacted, small town Wyoming reported over 700 abortions in a year’s time. More than double than was estimated.

Fast forward to today. How could there be less than 5 abortions reported in the last 5 years? The answer: abortion providers in our state have decided to violate state law and not report because there was no penalty for not reporting. Brazenly, two Wyoming providers publicly stated as much, implying they were above the law.

So why report anyway? There’s a saying in the halls of the Wyoming Capital: good data makes good policy. While the abortion reports are completely anonymous and leave out any personal identifiable information, it does include data on the age of the woman, the age of the fetus, the type of procedure used, and any complications that occurred. If an abortion clinic had an unusually high number of cervical lacerations or uterine perforations, wouldn’t that be something of interest to ensure women’s health? Or if we had a high number of 15-18 year olds seeking abortions from a particular county, wouldn’t that be of interest to ensure we were providing the resources and education to prevent unwanted pregnancies?

Thankfully, things changed this year. With the help of my cosponsors, we successfully ran a bill that added investigation and enforcement mechanisms regarding abortion reporting to ensure the existing reporting law is being followed. Governor Gordan signed the bill into law earlier this year. I’m of the opinion that it is never ok to rip apart and kill a child in the womb, but until such a time as this barbaric practice is done away, shouldn’t we know how many lives are being taken from us? Shouldn’t we do more to protect women’s health? With the enactment of this new law on July 1, 2019, we’re one step closer in protecting all life.

Scott Clem
State Representative for House District 31

Scott Clem has been married for 14 years and has 4 children. In addition to serving as a pastor, he is serving his 3rd term in the Wyoming House and is currently the vice-chairman of the House Labor, Health & Social Services Committee.

Posted by: AT 04:35 pm   |  Permalink   |  Email
Sunday, August 04 2019

Re Sheila McGuire’s article dated July 23, it covers such a vast array of topics, it is difficult to know where to begin. It is peculiar at least that a newspaper reporter would be spouting so many opinions without a shred of supporting evidence. Let me confine my comments to just a few of Ms. McGuire’s paragraphs. First, she asserts that “the Constitution explicitly forbids the establishment of a religion that dictates the public sphere”. Really? What the U.S. Constitution actually says is that “Congress shall establish no religion”. In other words, religion not a federal issue. It is a moral issue that is currently enshrined in the platforms of both major political parties.

Democrats officially favor a woman’s right to abort her unborn child. Republicans, by contrast, believe that every child has a right to life from conception that is inalienable. Party platforms constitute what each party considers timeless truths. Moving to the first of two paragraphs on legislation, Ms. McGuire first asserts that some states’ draconian laws require rape victims to give birth but also require them to co-parent with their rapist. State law in every state sends rapists to prison, surely. No documentation is provided for this extravagant claim. If this dubious situation is true in some states, it is definitely not the case in Wyoming, which passed a statute earlier this year to prevent rapists from having any parental rights (https://www.wyoleg.gov/Legislation/2019/HB0107). Both rape victims and babies that are conceived in rape need to be supported under the law and by the community. Next, “Other legislation claims terminating a pregnancy is never a medical necessity and makes no exceptions.” This might very well be the case. However, Ms. McGuire chooses as her example an ectopic pregnancy. Anyone knows that ectopic pregnancies are tragic situations that cannot result in a healthy live birth and are also extremely dangerous to the mother. The standard treatment for ectopic pregnancy is not abortion but rather a procedure called salpingectomy. Currently there is no way to save the life of the embryo, so this is an unfortunate outcome of saving the life of the mother. So the chosen example was faulty at best.

Posted by: AT 04:33 pm   |  Permalink   |  Email